Bellator
UFC judge under review by commission following Paddy Pimblett’s controversial victory vs Jared Gordon

Judges’ controversial decisions have always been a negative aspect of combat sports. Recently, in two important bouts, the main event at Bellator 289 in Uncasville and the co-main event at UFC 282 in Las Vegas, judges gave debatable decisions that resulted in huge upsets in the MMA arena.
The first event that earned huge attention for contentious decisions was the main event fight of Bellator 289 between Raufeon Stots and Danny Sabatello. Mohegan Athletic Department Director of Athletics Mike Mazzulli wrote in a prepared statement about the clash:
“In the last Bellator event [December 9, 2022], there was a controversy in the Sabatello vs. Stots fight. After reviewing the fight, three rounds of the five rounds were extremely close, and the other two were marginally close rounds.”
The 50-45 Sabatello scorecard in last night's Bellator main event was the very first 50-45 scorecard in favour of the loser ever recorded in our database. @ekc
— MMADecisions.com (@MMADecisions) December 10, 2022
Mazzulli pointed out that one judge had favored Sabaleta in all five rounds of the fight, which was not the case for the other judges.
“One judge had Sabatello winning all five rounds, which is controversial. But ultimately, Stots won the decision, which is the correct result. In an effort to make this a learning moment, I have informed all three judges we will be reviewing the fight together.”
Doug Crosby rendered the contentious decision, and even though Sabaleta lost the bout, he was awarded the record scorecard for a loser. Crosby was again appointed as a judge for the co-main event of UFC 282, and again the judges produced yet another controversial decision on December 10.
#UFC282 Official Scorecard: Paddy Pimblett vs Jared Gordon 👇
All Tonight’s Scorecards ➡️: https://t.co/ZOw63NkfWN pic.twitter.com/xS4LbE648K
— UFC News (@UFCNews) December 11, 2022
The media got furious this time and referred to the decision as a daylight robbery. It seems the athletic commission is not happy with these injustices happening in the MMA arena, and they are planning to suspend the judges if they are found guilty after a fair inquiry.
“This is a very serious situation. The Mohegan Tribe Athletic Department always looks out for the best interests of all fighters. In the past, the Mohegan Tribe Athletic Department has sanctioned officials that are not performing to the level that is required. Such sanctions, when they occur, are not made public.”

Latest
-
NFL
/ 38 mins agoPatrick Mahomes clan hits turbulent times with mother’s health woes following brother’s controversy casting shadow on NFL triumph
It appears that Kansas City chiefs’ time is not going well because the quarterback...
By Shabiha -
NFL
/ 3 hours agoTom Brady’s son Jack expresses interest in playing QB for 1 leading college football team
Apparently, the younger Brady is planning to continue the legacy of his father as...
By Maliha -
NFL
/ 3 hours agoFormer Panthers QB Cam Newton claps back at Shannon Sharpe’s scathing criticism with resolute promise to prove his worth
Shannon Sharpe might rethink expressing a single complaint to Cam Newton after this former...
By Shabiha -
NBA
/ 3 hours agoDolphins S DeShon Elliott shuts down CB Jalen Ramsey critics with powerful “check the numbers, check the tape” statement
DeShon Elliott sticks up for defending Jalen Ramsey, a cornerback who is currently the...
By Shabiha -
Boxing
/ 4 hours agoDoes Tyson Fury vs Oleksandr Usyk’s verbal insults online puts boxing’s credibility in jeopardy?
Tyson Fury has expressed his thoughts on the collapsed negotiations for his fight with...
By Ayush Harsh